Talk:Fast Fridays: 30 Minutes for God: Difference between revisions
| Line 110: | Line 110: | ||
God likes intercessors! | God likes intercessors! | ||
== Why is the Old Testament God so mean? (revelation and salvation history) == | |||
common objection to our faith is the the OT God is mean. | |||
There are various approaches to answering this question, including | |||
* OT is not literal (Sodom/ the Flood, exaggerations, esp. regarding war) | |||
** so those events in the OT are either allegorical, moral, or not the whole truth | |||
** ex. God tells the Isrealites to kill all the Caananites, yet, the Israelites end up marrying Canaanite women... which is it? | |||
* God was only killing people who themselves were really mean | |||
Seems to me that Jesus answered it best in Luke 13:4: https://bible.usccb.org/bible/luke/13?4 | |||
<blockquote>Or those eighteen people who were killed when the tower at Siloam fell on them*—do you think they were more guilty than everyone else who lived in Jerusalem? | |||
By no means! But I tell you, if you do not repent, you will all perish as they did!”</blockquote> | |||
Let's step back: | |||
The Israelites were not special, they were special because God chose them as his vehicle for salvation of all mankind. | |||
A couple conclusions must be drawn from that: | |||
1. The Israelites, as a people, were no better or worse than any other peoples at the time; indeed, we see this over and over again when they violate God's word | |||
2. God necessarily sustained them as a people through to the Incarnation of Christ. | |||
The OT shows us just how brutal and beautiful ancient life could be. Sodom (), the rape of the slave girl (Judges 19:25), the Rape of Tamar (2 Sm 13:1) | |||
Concubines were everywhere. In defense of Jerusalem, God struck dead 185,000 Assyrians (Is 37:36) and after invoking the same against 80,000 Greeks, to show God's power, Judas Macabeaus hangs Ncanor's head and arm on the wall of the city (2 Mac 15:35). (Btw, Henry VIII did the same to Saint John Fisher, but Fisher's head retained an eerie liveliness that freaked out people, so his head was flung into the Thames.) | |||
God gave us free will. There is no sin if committed unwillfully (when raped by her brother, Tamar did not sin). By extension, we must choose not to sin, choose to return to God (sin is separation, so we must un-separate ourselves) freely, consciously, and willfully. | |||
So tell a 12th century B.S. exile from Egypt that a stone some crazed dude who brought you into the desert and caused you much suffering carries the word of God. We see the easy fall back upon idolatry: build a golden calf like the Egyptians did and we'll have milk and honey like we did back in Egypt. These people weren't just uneasily persuaded, they were hard to change, for their reality was not with the Living God (confirmation bias). | |||
Revision as of 09:17, 24 October 2024
Upcoming topics
Deus Propicius Esto: the battle for our souls
Deus Propicius Esto a medieval prayer for God's protection in the "the dreadful judgment" perhaps originating from St. Augustine was common in Medieval "psalters," or books of prayer popular music / popular culture how do we Christians approach music and lyrics that celebrate sin? Bromley has a story about asking his Confessor for permission to see the Rolling Stones -- why ask the question in the first place? Why did the priest find it okay to attend the concert?
There is a much larger topic here about how to live in a fallen world
When we sin, Jesus suffers; When we suffer, Jesus suffers
The Cross.
St. Jean Vianney said, "When you confess your sins, you take the nails out of Jesus.” (https://www.ncregister.com/blog/st-john-vianney-confession)
> Jesus died for every sin ever committed and that will ever be committed. > he also suffers with us >> not like a mother suffering when a child suffers >> not like Mary at the Cross, "a sword piercing her heart" > no, he actually suffers what we suffer.
Imaging that God is experiencing your life in real time.
Book of Revelation
Revelation = singular
authorship context > historical > Church history > theological > anagogically
numbers:
- 7 = no. of covenants, and completeness
- 8 = infinity
- 12 = tribes/ disciples
- 1000 = perfection
Senses of Scripture
Literal Allegorical Moral Anagogical
Sin
definition nature effect concupiscence
Dating the scriptures
Skeptics and academics who wish to prove the Gospels are fiction will point to the dating of the Gospel writings and say, "See! Gotchya! They wrote it after the destruction of the Temple in order to claim that Jesus prophesized it!"
timeline > Peter/ Paul> epistles written before their death historical context logic of oral history inspired writings
Adam' s choice: martyr or God
Satan threatened Adam's life:
You certainly will not die!
"The Way"
Why was it called that? What can we learn from it? TJ: Road to Emmaus
Observation, Judgment and forgiveness
God does not ask us to relinquish the intellect and free will he blessed us with. No! We must exercise judgment!
The question is what do we do with that judgment.
> mlb and trash, Wuerl, etc.
Modernism: the Parable of the Tenants
Mt 21:33 https://bible.usccb.org/bible/matthew/21?23 they kill the landowners' phrophets, then his son.
The Return of the Unclean Spirit: Lk 11:24
explains so much of the world today!
Maslow >> ppl need spiritual fulfllment or get Wolsam
what isn't filled will be filled by demons
"Who can forgive sins except God?" < Jesus didn't say that!
The message wasn't so much he is God (he is) but that the Son of Man is authorized by God to forgive sins
> tied in to priestly forgiveness of sins ... Great Commission etc.
God likes intercessors!
Why is the Old Testament God so mean? (revelation and salvation history)
common objection to our faith is the the OT God is mean.
There are various approaches to answering this question, including
- OT is not literal (Sodom/ the Flood, exaggerations, esp. regarding war)
- so those events in the OT are either allegorical, moral, or not the whole truth
- ex. God tells the Isrealites to kill all the Caananites, yet, the Israelites end up marrying Canaanite women... which is it?
- God was only killing people who themselves were really mean
Seems to me that Jesus answered it best in Luke 13:4: https://bible.usccb.org/bible/luke/13?4
Or those eighteen people who were killed when the tower at Siloam fell on them*—do you think they were more guilty than everyone else who lived in Jerusalem? By no means! But I tell you, if you do not repent, you will all perish as they did!”
Let's step back: The Israelites were not special, they were special because God chose them as his vehicle for salvation of all mankind.
A couple conclusions must be drawn from that: 1. The Israelites, as a people, were no better or worse than any other peoples at the time; indeed, we see this over and over again when they violate God's word 2. God necessarily sustained them as a people through to the Incarnation of Christ.
The OT shows us just how brutal and beautiful ancient life could be. Sodom (), the rape of the slave girl (Judges 19:25), the Rape of Tamar (2 Sm 13:1)
Concubines were everywhere. In defense of Jerusalem, God struck dead 185,000 Assyrians (Is 37:36) and after invoking the same against 80,000 Greeks, to show God's power, Judas Macabeaus hangs Ncanor's head and arm on the wall of the city (2 Mac 15:35). (Btw, Henry VIII did the same to Saint John Fisher, but Fisher's head retained an eerie liveliness that freaked out people, so his head was flung into the Thames.)
God gave us free will. There is no sin if committed unwillfully (when raped by her brother, Tamar did not sin). By extension, we must choose not to sin, choose to return to God (sin is separation, so we must un-separate ourselves) freely, consciously, and willfully.
So tell a 12th century B.S. exile from Egypt that a stone some crazed dude who brought you into the desert and caused you much suffering carries the word of God. We see the easy fall back upon idolatry: build a golden calf like the Egyptians did and we'll have milk and honey like we did back in Egypt. These people weren't just uneasily persuaded, they were hard to change, for their reality was not with the Living God (confirmation bias).