Blog roll: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Blog Posts''' | '''Blog Posts''' | ||
== [[Blog:"(and you yourself a sword will pierce)": an Easter reflection]] == | == [[Blog:Visions of Modernism Part 1: Fátima & sins of the flesh|Visions of Modernism Part 1: Fátima & sins of the flesh]] == | ||
[[File:Miracle_of_the_Sun.jpg|thumb|<small>Miracle of the Sun: The crowd at Cova da Iria looking towards the Sun on 13 October 1917 (wikipedia)</small>]] | |||
<small>May 22, 2024 by Michael</small> | |||
As I start to write this a few days past the May 13 anniversary, and considering the world about us, one can hardly think that Our Lady of Fatima's 1917 warnings of the Father's wrath expired with two world wars and the fall of Soviet communism. Likewise, it is difficult to imagine that God is any less offended by our sins today than in 1919, when Our Lady told the young Jacinta that "sins of the flesh" were condemning more souls to perdition than any other form of sin. | |||
While we have progressed materially since then, I am hard put to think of more than a single way we have advanced spiritually, and that can only be through the purifiying effect of our general depridation upon a faithful core. | |||
<small>[[Blog:Visions of Modernism Part 1: Fátima & sins of the flesh|Read more]]</small> | |||
== [[Blog:Recieving (not taking) Communion|Recieving (not taking) Communion]] == | |||
[[File:Holy-Communion_Pietro_Longhi,_Eucharistiae_Sacramentum_wikipedia_cropped_bright.png|thumb|<small>Holy Communion by Pietro Longhi</small>]] | |||
<small>May 13, 2024 by Michael</small> | |||
Even from Catholics, one may hear the Rite of Communion referred to -- incorrectly -- as "taking Communion." | |||
'''"Taking" Communion -?''' | |||
It seems that "taking" Communion is more commonly used by Protestants, and, if so, perhaps it represents a doctrinal diistinction regarding the Holy Eucharist. This website is uninterested in Catholic v. Protestant apologetic debates, so we will not go into the Protestant choice of words here, and, instead, focus on Catholic teaching of the Sacrament of the Eucharist and why one "recieves" and does not "take" Holy Communion. | |||
A possible source of the confusion may stem from the use of "partake" by St. Paul in 1 Corinthians 17: | |||
Because the loaf of bread is one, we, though many, are one body, for we all partake of the one loaf (1 Cor 10:16-17) | |||
[[Blog:Recieving (not taking) Communion|<small>Read more</small>]] | |||
== [[Blog:Separation from God: free will, sin and willful damnation|Separation from God: free will, sin and willful damnation]] == | |||
[[File:Jesus_und_Ehebrecherin.jpg|thumb|<small>Jesus und Ehebrecherin (Jesus and the Adulterer)</small>]] | |||
<small>May 6, 2024 by Michael</small><blockquote>'''''Then Jesus straightened up and said to her, “Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?” She replied, “No one, sir.” Then Jesus said, “Neither do I condemn you. Go, from now on do not sin any more.”''''' (Jn 8:11)</blockquote>As across Salvation History, here we have the blessing and the correction -- called a "curse" in the Old Testament: <blockquote>'''''"Go, from now on do not sin any more."'''''</blockquote>There has been much wonder and academic debate over this passage. Some scholars say it was added to the Gospel of John well after its writing, and is thus inauthentic. Others say it was in the original manuscripts but dropped for a time for fear that the passage legimized adultery. | |||
[[Blog:Separation from God: free will, sin and willful damnation|<small>Read more</small>]] | |||
== [[Blog:"(and you yourself a sword will pierce)": an Easter reflection|"(and you yourself a sword will pierce)": an Easter reflection]] == | |||
[[File:Menologion of Basil 037.jpg|thumb|308x308px|<small>Painting from the Menologion of Basil II (c. 1000 AD)</small>]] | [[File:Menologion of Basil 037.jpg|thumb|308x308px|<small>Painting from the Menologion of Basil II (c. 1000 AD)</small>]] | ||
<small>April 1, 2024 by Michael</small> | <small>April 1, 2024 by Michael</small> | ||
| Line 9: | Line 39: | ||
''(and you yourself a sword will pierce)'' | ''(and you yourself a sword will pierce)'' | ||
''so that the thoughts of many hearts may be revealed.”''</blockquote>God speaks to us, St. Paul instructs us, "through his prophets in the holy scriptures" (Rm 1:2), but not always so plainly as Simeon to Mary:<blockquote>''(and you yourself a sword will pierce)''</blockquote>[[Blog:"(and you yourself a sword will pierce)": an Easter reflection|Read more]] | ''so that the thoughts of many hearts may be revealed.”''</blockquote>God speaks to us, St. Paul instructs us, "through his prophets in the holy scriptures" (Rm 1:2), but not always so plainly as Simeon to Mary:<blockquote>''(and you yourself a sword will pierce)''</blockquote>[[Blog:"(and you yourself a sword will pierce)": an Easter reflection|<small>Read more</small>]] | ||
==[[Blog:Why are there no eulogies in a Catholic Funeral Mass?|Why are there no eulogies in a Catholic Funeral Mass?]]== | |||
[[File:Funeral mass John Mitchell Collection, CUA.png|thumb|<small>Funeral mass John Mitchell Collection, CUA.png</small> |305x305px]]<small>March 12, 2024 by Michael</small> | |||
The purpose of the Liturgy & lay participation at Mass: Liturgical celebrations are, by definition, public ceremonies (see [[Glossary of terms for catechism of the Catholic faith#liturgy|Glossary: Liturgy]]). But they are not for the public. In liturgical celebrations, the faithful come together to celebrate, praise, and glorify God. When we interject ourselves into the Mass, we make it about us, not God. I love a good Homily, and enjoy a particularly beautiful choir, but those liturgical elements elevate and do not replace the purpose of the Mass. | |||
[[Blog:Why are there no eulogies in a Catholic Funeral Mass?|<small>Read more</small>]] | |||
[[Category:Blog]] | [[Category:Blog]] | ||